Entity Owned Property summary
AI-generated overview
The property is a freestanding single-tenant retail building totaling 9,100 square feet, located on a 1.35-acre lot at 7592 Highway 63 in Speedwell, Tennessee. The site historically served as a Dollar General store and is configured as a retail outlet for day-to-day consumer goods and services. The building and site are maintained under a double net lease structure, with landlord responsibilities generally limited to roof and structural maintenance, while the tenant bears responsibility for operating expenses. The property is situated near major regional attractions, including proximity to the Cumberland Gap National Historical Park and the Powell River.
Property profile
Verified
Property type
Retail space
Use group
RETAIL STORES (PERSONAL SERVICES)
Year built
2013
Construction
FRAME
Total area
9,292 SF
Lot
1.27 ac (55,321 SF)
APN
089 02104
UPID
US80-2820496
Cap rate & NOI
Priority signal for investors
Implied cap rate, NOI & suggested price
Cap rate vs submarket · NOI estimate · 3 price anchors
Location
Value estimations
Realmo proprietary · 4 methods
AI Approach
AI
$1.35M
CAP Approach
CAP
by Request
Comparable Approach
Comparable
$1.21M
Blend (final)
Blend
$1.33M
Owner & transaction history
since 2025
Last sale
$1.5M
4 recorded transactions
Zoning & alternative use
Top alternative use upside
Commercial (general)
$915,000
+20.9%
Comparables
6 recent transactions · within 1.5 miComparable in this city
6 recent transactions
Comparable in this City
Similar Nearby for Sale
Recent comparable sales
Sale price & price/SF · Sale date & distance · Adjustments & confidence
Value estimation
Instant AI valuation built from comps, income signals, and proprietary benchmarks. A defensible range, not a single guess.
17% off on annual
Unlock the complete Valuation workflow
Full NOI reconstruction, selected comps, alternative-use scenarios, data audit and PDF export.
Sensitivity value band
Source audit · 6 inputs
PDF export
Analytics Standard · 5 reports
from $99/month
from $99/month
Summary
1
Valuation conclusion
Included free
Estimated market value
$1.33M
Value range
$1.19M – $1.46M
±10% around blend
Estimated value / SF
$143 / SF
Confidence
Property data
88
Market benchmarks
33
Comparable evidence
60
$1.19M
blend $1.33M
$1.46M
Market-derived valuation under stabilized market assumptions. Desktop analysis. No physical inspection performed.
2
Subject property
Included free
GBA
9,292 SF
Lot area
1.27 ac
Year built
2013
Stories
1
APN
089 02104
Assessed value
$258,880
Annual tax
$5,954
3
Income approach: direct capitalization
Partial preview
Not enough income data on file for a CAP-approach estimation.
4
Sales comparison
Partial preview
Sales approach indication
$1.21M
Range $251k – $1.49M
Evidence
6 found
Recent peer sales in this city
5
Sensitivity & risk
Partial preview
Downside
−10%
Base
$1.33M
Upside
+10%
Bounds of the ±10% band vs the blend — never simulated scenarios.
6
Current market position
Included free
Benchmark
Observed band ($/SF)AverageSubject delta
County 33 sales
$82
+75%
Band = middle half (Q1–Q3) of recorded sale $/SF for this use type per geography; the diamond marks the subject at $143/SF. Delta below average reads as headroom. Source: Realmo CRE sales derivatives (county records).
7
Alternative use screening
Partial preview
Top alternative use
Commercial (general)
Gross theoretical uplift
+21%
vs current-use indication
8
Data & methodology
Included free
Building area
County record
Property tax
County record
Assessed value
County record
Zoning designation
Not available
Operating expenses
Not available
Market rent
Not available
Not analyzed due to unavailable source data: actual rent roll, tenant leases, physical condition and capital
requirements are outside a desktop analysis.
Cost Approach excluded: replacement-cost inputs are not on file.
Automated valuation analysis, not a licensed appraisal. Figures are derived from public
records and proprietary models. Desktop analysis: no physical inspection, tenant leases or reported
property income. Verify with a licensed appraiser before transacting.
Cap rate
Cap rate calculated from real income and expense signals, benchmarked against sales of similar assets nearby.
17% off on annual
Unlock the complete Cap Rate workflow
Full market tables, editable assumptions, comparable evidence, saved work and exports.
9-scenario matrix
Market rates by use type
PDF export
Analytics Standard · 5 reports
from $99/month
from $99/month
Overview
No cap rate is computable for this property yet: no recorded sale, income signal or market-rate row for its use type.
Price sensitivity
The rate is the decision lever; valuation is the consequence.
Test a cap rate
Implied value$1.50M
Move the market yield to see immediate price impact.
Value / SF
$161
Vs. selected
Base
Derivation
NOI ÷ cap
Arithmetic over the derived NOI * — not market scenario modeling.
NOI × cap matrix
Preview
Preview of 9 modeled outcomes.
NOI
5.00%7.00%9.00%
$94k
$1.88M
$1.35M
$1.05M
$105k
$2.09M
$1.50M
$1.16M
$115k
$2.30M
$1.65M
$1.28M
NOI sensitivity ±10% across the 5 / 7 / 9% anchors — derivation of the NOI above.
Property tax & assessments
Tax year 2023Property tax & assessments
Tax year 2023
Tax billed
$5,954
Tax year 2023
Assessed value
$258,880
Assessed 2023
Previous assessed
$258,880
+0.0% YoY
Effective rate
2.30%
On assessed value
Assessed land
$44,240
Assessed improvement
$214,640
Land market value
$110,600
Improvement market value
$536,600
Total market value
$647,200
Applied tax rate
13.0000
Automated cap rate analysis. Based on public records, market benchmarks and proprietary
models. Verify with a licensed professional before transacting.
Property description
Physical attributes from public recordsBuilding & lot
Public records
Property type
Retail space
Use group
RETAIL STORES (PERSONAL SERVICES)
Status
Off-Market
Year built
2013
Construction
FRAME
Heating
YES
Cooling
AC.PACKAGE
Stories
1
Units
1
Bathrooms
1
Total area
9,292 SF
Lot
1.27 ac (55,321 SF)
APN
089 02104
UPID
US80-2820496
Jurisdiction
CLAIBORNE
Zoning & alternative use
Zoning · permitted uses
No zoning code is on file for this parcel. Zoning coverage grows with every catalog release.
Alternative use value scenarios
Repositioning upside vs current use
Alternative use deep dive — conversion cost, permits, timeline
Conversion cost estimate · Permit path & risks · Stabilized NOI per option
Building & site characteristics
From public records
Year built
2013
Construction
FRAME
Heating
YES
Cooling
Yes
Stories
1
Units
1
Bathrooms
1
Lot
1.27 ac
Zoning
The recorded zoning designation, what the district officially allows, and the municipal source it comes from.
No zoning code is on file for this parcel. Zoning coverage grows with every catalog release — check back, or open Location Intelligence for use analysis of this corner.
Ownership Intelligence
Find the owner behind the property.
Unlock the evidence behind ownership: portfolio, transactions, debt and signals that help you decide who to contact next.
What opens after registration
Ownership report
Owner identityResolved entity and name variants
Portfolio holdingsLinked properties and estimated value
Deal signalsSell-side activity worth following
Debt & historyRecorded loans and transaction history
Private report access
See the ownership record for this address.
Registration is required before any owner information is shown.
One complete report on every paid plan · 5 · 30 · 100 reports per month.
Owner of record and activity signals are derived from public records and modeled classifications.
They do not confirm beneficial ownership or intent to transact.
Try Rey
Ask anything about this address in plain English.
“Is 15.6% cap rate sustainable?” · “Best tenant mix for BU1?” · “What’s the redev upside?”
You own 7592 Hwy 63?
List it free. Reach 20,000 daily buyers.
We’ve already pulled the facts. Confirm photos + price and you’re live in 2 minutes.
Full reports are paid
Unlock the full Property Analytics report
Pick a plan to open full owner contacts, all 4 valuations with methodology, the refine flow, comparable adjustments, the foot-traffic deep dive and PDF / CSV export. Cancel anytime.
