Realmo Analytics

Get reports on 50M+ commercial properties in the US. Find and target property leads based on your business goal.

Financial
Distress signals
Property profile

155 Lk Blvd Redding, CA 96003

OFF-MARKET
Retail space
Property ID
US09-2933971
1.18 ac lot
Entity Owned Owner of record is a legal entity (LLC / corporation). Absentee Owner Owner mailing address differs from the property address. Free & Clear No active or open recorded mortgage detected.
Saved · see the list in your Dashboard
Market Trends Soon

Property summary

AI-generated overview

A retail suite located in a strip mall completed in 1989 at 155 Lake Blvd in Redding, California. The suite is part of an established retail center and is positioned within the interior row of units between nearby fast-casual tenants. The property has prominent signage opportunities and is accessed via signalized intersections on Lake Blvd at/near Hwy 299, providing convenient connectivity to the surrounding road network, including direct access to Interstate 5 in both directions. The center…

Ownership intelligence

Who controls the opportunity?

Owner of record from public deeds, plus portfolio, hold profile and investor signals where the data supports them. Included with a plan.

Owner contacts

Can we reach the decision maker?

Skip-traced phones and e-mails of the owner. Included with a plan.

Debts

What is owed, to whom, and when it comes due

Recorded lenders, amounts and estimated maturities of the owner's loan book — included with a plan.

Property tax · 2024

What does the county charge?
$12k
Tax billed · 2024
Assessed value$1.13M
Assessed land$435k
Assessed improvement$697k
Effective rate1.07%

Value estimate

· Oct 2026
$210k
$189k – $231k
AI approach$210k

Realmo valuation models over county records.

Recently sold

What actually traded nearby?
$124/SF
Submarket average, outlier-cleaned · 31 recorded sales of this use type
Observed band · Q1–Q3$57 – $240

Cap rate analysis

How does the asset earn?

No income signal is modeled for this parcel yet — the Cap Rates tab runs the workflow.

Zoning insight

No data for this section
What can be built here?

No zoning code is on file for this parcel. Coverage grows with every catalog release.

JurisdictionSHASTA

Location intelligence

Which uses thrive at this corner?
Best fit: Realty agency
Demand heat for this use is drawn on the map · LocInt grid
Demand index
Realty agency13.9
Law Firm13.8
Hair Salon12.4

Location

155 Lk Blvd Redding, CA 96003-2539
County assessor Recorded deeds · 1 transfer Qualifying comp sales · not on file Zoning catalog · not on file

Every figure names its source: public record, benchmark, or modeled. Coverage varies by property — thin data is stated as missing, never invented.

Comparables

6 recorded sales · 18 properties nearby
Recent sales nearby
6 recorded sales in this ZIP, last 8 years
Address Sale price Sold Size
1294 Lk, Redding, CA 96003-1738 $379,500 Jun 2025 1,080 SF
Redding, CA 96003 $5,763,500 Jun 2025 No data
930 Dana, Redding, CA 96003 $26,857,500 Mar 2025 40,500 SF
900 Dana, Redding, CA 96003-4053 $26,857,500 Mar 2025 125,402 SF
950 Dana, Redding, CA 96003-4079 $26,857,500 Mar 2025 No data
974 Dana, Redding, CA 96003-4079 $26,857,500 Dec 2024 6,000 SF
Sale prices and dates as our records hold them, one row per building. A deed can cover more of a building than the size shown, so read the price against the size rather than dividing one by the other.
Comparable nearby
6 properties of the same type nearby
Try Rey
Ask anything about this address in plain English.
“Is 15.6% cap rate sustainable?” · “Best tenant mix for BU1?” · “What’s the redev upside?”
You own 155 Lk Blvd?
List it free. Reach 20,000 daily buyers.
We’ve already pulled the facts. Confirm photos + price and you’re live in 2 minutes.
More about this property
Thanks! Your message was sent.
Error! Your message wasn't sent.
Please enter your name
Please enter email
Please enter the email in the correct format
Please enter phone
Please enter the number in the correct format
Please enter message
Why this one?
Saved
Reason not saved — we won't ask again