Entity Owned Property profile
Verified
Property type
Commercial real estate
Use group
COMMERCIAL CONDOMINUIM
Year built
1989
Total area
1,100 SF
Lot
0.02 ac (697 SF)
Zoning code
PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP
APN
373009000030
UPID
US87-1099520
Cap rate & NOI
Priority signal for investors
Implied cap rate, NOI & suggested price
Cap rate vs submarket · NOI estimate · 3 price anchors
Location
Value estimations
Realmo proprietary · 4 methods
AI Approach
AI
$235k
CAP Approach
CAP
by Request
Comparable Approach
Comparable
by Request
Blend (final)
Blend
$235k
Owner & transaction history
since 2018
2 recorded transactions
Zoning & alternative use
PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP · Chesapeake, VA
Comparables
6 recent transactions · within 1.5 miComparable in this city
6 recent transactions
Comparable in this City
Similar Nearby for Sale
Similar Nearby for Lease
Recent comparable sales
Sale price & price/SF · Sale date & distance · Adjustments & confidence
Value estimation
Instant AI valuation built from comps, income signals, and proprietary benchmarks. A defensible range, not a single guess.
17% off on annual
Unlock the complete Valuation workflow
Full NOI reconstruction, selected comps, alternative-use scenarios, data audit and PDF export.
All 3 comparables with addresses
Sensitivity value band
Source audit · 6 inputs
PDF export
Analytics Standard · 5 reports
from $99/month
from $99/month
Summary
1
Valuation conclusion
Included free
Estimated market value
$235k
Value range
$212k – $259k
±10% around blend
Estimated value / SF
$214 / SF
Confidence
Low
3 county-verified comps
Property data
100
Market benchmarks
100
Comparable evidence
30
$212k
blend $235k
$259k
Market-derived valuation under stabilized market assumptions. Desktop analysis. No physical inspection performed.
2
Subject property
Included free
GBA
1,100 SF
Lot area
0.02 ac
Year built
1989
Stories
1
APN
373009000030
Zoning
PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP
Assessed value
$120,700
Annual tax
$1,125
3
Income approach: direct capitalization
Partial preview
Not enough income data on file for a CAP-approach estimation.
4
Sales comparison
Partial preview
Sales approach indication
$205k
Weighted, 3 comps · low confidence
Evidence
3 found · 3 selected
County-verified recorded sales
Comparable
Sale dateSale price$ / SF
18.1 mi away · 1,202 SF
21.1 mi away · 1,104 SF
5
Sensitivity & risk
Partial preview
Downside
−10%
Base
$235k
Upside
+10%
Bounds of the ±10% band vs the blend — never simulated scenarios.
6
Current market position
Included free
Benchmark
Observed band ($/SF)AverageSubject delta
ZIP 81 sales
$167
+28%
Submarket 120 sales
$163
+31%
County 120 sales
$163
+31%
Band = middle half (Q1–Q3) of recorded sale $/SF for this use type per geography; the diamond marks the subject at $214/SF. Delta below average reads as headroom. Source: Realmo CRE sales derivatives (county records).
7
Data & methodology
Included free
Building area
County record
Property tax
County record
Assessed value
County record
Zoning designation
County record
Operating expenses
Not available
Market rent
Not available
Not analyzed due to unavailable source data: actual rent roll, tenant leases, physical condition and capital
requirements are outside a desktop analysis.
Cost Approach excluded: replacement-cost inputs are not on file.
Automated valuation analysis, not a licensed appraisal. Figures are derived from public
records and proprietary models. Desktop analysis: no physical inspection, tenant leases or reported
property income. Verify with a licensed appraiser before transacting.
Cap rate
Cap rate calculated from real income and expense signals, benchmarked against sales of similar assets nearby.
17% off on annual
Unlock the complete Cap Rate workflow
Full market tables, editable assumptions, comparable evidence, saved work and exports.
9-scenario matrix
Comparable evidence · 3 sales
Market rates by use type
PDF export
Analytics Standard · 5 reports
from $99/month
from $99/month
Overview
No cap rate is computable for this property yet: no recorded sale, income signal or market-rate row for its use type.
Price sensitivity
The rate is the decision lever; valuation is the consequence.
Test a cap rate
Implied value$121k
Move the market yield to see immediate price impact.
Value / SF
$110
Vs. selected
Base
Derivation
NOI ÷ cap
Arithmetic over the derived NOI * — not market scenario modeling.
NOI × cap matrix
Preview
Preview of 9 modeled outcomes.
NOI
5.00%7.00%9.00%
$8k
$152k
$109k
$84k
$8k
$169k
$121k
$94k
$9k
$186k
$133k
$103k
NOI sensitivity ±10% across the 5 / 7 / 9% anchors — derivation of the NOI above.
Comparable evidence
Partial preview
Recorded sales nearby
3 found
Low confidence · county-verified
Closest comparable
$60k
7.2 mi · Jan 2026 · $43/SF
Property tax & assessments
Tax year 2019Property tax & assessments
Tax year 2019
Tax billed
$1,125
Tax year 2019
Assessed value
$120,700
Assessed 2024
Previous assessed
$120,700
+0.0% YoY
Effective rate
0.93%
On assessed value
Assessed land
$19,800
Assessed improvement
$100,900
Land market value
$19,800
Improvement market value
$100,900
Total market value
$120,700
Applied tax rate
43.0000
Automated cap rate analysis. Based on public records, market benchmarks and proprietary
models. Verify with a licensed professional before transacting.
Property description
Physical attributes from public recordsBuilding & lot
Public records
Property type
Commercial real estate
Use group
COMMERCIAL CONDOMINUIM
Status
Off-Market
Year built
1989
Heating
HEAT PUMP
Stories
1
Units
1
Total area
1,100 SF
Lot
0.02 ac (697 SF)
Zoning code
PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP
APN
373009000030
UPID
US87-1099520
Jurisdiction
CHESAPEAKE CITY
Zoning & alternative use
PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP · Chesapeake, VAZoning PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP · permitted uses
PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP · Chesapeake, VA
Permitted & conditional uses
Allowed uses · Special-permit conditions · Prohibited uses
Building & site characteristics
From public records
Year built
1989
Heating
HEAT PUMP
Stories
1
Units
1
Lot
0.02 ac
Zoning
The recorded zoning designation, what the district officially allows, and the municipal source it comes from.
Zoning designation
County-recorded code
PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP
Jurisdiction
Chesapeake, VA
Recorded code
PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP
Zoning Insight
What can be built and operated here — officially.
The district profile from the municipal source: what is on file for PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP in Chesapeake, VA.
What opens after registration
Zoning profile
2 official documentsVerified municipal sources with file download
Match provenanceAssignment basis, match tier and confidence
Private report access
See the official zoning profile for this address.
Registration is required before the official district profile is shown.
One complete report on every paid plan · 5 · 30 · 100 reports per month.
Ownership Intelligence
Find the owner behind the property.
Unlock the evidence behind ownership: portfolio, transactions, debt and signals that help you decide who to contact next.
What opens after registration
Ownership report
Owner identityResolved entity and name variants
Portfolio holdingsLinked properties and estimated value
Deal signalsSell-side activity worth following
Debt & historyRecorded loans and transaction history
Private report access
See the ownership record for this address.
Registration is required before any owner information is shown.
One complete report on every paid plan · 5 · 30 · 100 reports per month.
Owner of record and activity signals are derived from public records and modeled classifications.
They do not confirm beneficial ownership or intent to transact.
Try Rey
Ask anything about this address in plain English.
“Is 15.6% cap rate sustainable?” · “Best tenant mix for BU1?” · “What’s the redev upside?”
You own 1226 Executive Blvd Ste, Unit 103?
List it free. Reach 20,000 daily buyers.
We’ve already pulled the facts. Confirm photos + price and you’re live in 2 minutes.
Full reports are paid
Unlock the full Property Analytics report
Pick a plan to open full owner contacts, all 4 valuations with methodology, the refine flow, comparable adjustments, the foot-traffic deep dive and PDF / CSV export. Cancel anytime.
